Albert Camus Was Influenced by

Albert Camus is often remembered for a single striking image: a man pushing a boulder up a hill forever, and choosing to be happy anyway. That picture, drawn from his 1942 essay on the myth of Sisyphus, has made him one of the most quoted writers of the twentieth century. Yet few readers stop to ask where such an idea came from. Camus did not invent his philosophy of the absurd out of nothing. His thinking grew out of a poor childhood in colonial Algeria, a serious illness, a demanding classical education, and a series of encounters with older thinkers whose questions he borrowed even when he rejected their answers.

This essay examines the main influences that shaped Camus, looking first at his personal and geographic roots, then at the philosophical and literary sources he studied, and finally at the political events that pushed his thought in new directions.

Camus was born in 1913 in Mondovi, Algeria, then a French colony. His father died in the First World War when Camus was an infant, and his mother, who was partly deaf and could barely read, cleaned houses to support the family. They lived in a small apartment in a working-class district of Algiers with almost no books. Camus reached the university only because a schoolteacher, Louis Germain, recognized his ability and pushed him toward a scholarship. At seventeen he was diagnosed with tuberculosis, which ended his hopes of a career as a goalkeeper and forced him to confront the possibility of early death. These facts matter for understanding his writing. Poverty taught him to distrust abstract theories that ignored ordinary suffering. Illness gave his work its constant awareness of physical limits. The Mediterranean sun, the sea, and the desert became the measure against which he judged every philosophical claim, since a system that could not account for the pleasure of swimming or the weight of heat seemed to him incomplete.

The first major influence on Camus as a thinker was his formal study of ancient and early Christian thought. At the University of Algiers he wrote his thesis on the relationship between Greek philosophy and Christianity, focusing on Plotinus and Saint Augustine. Augustine was, like Camus, a North African writing in Latin about the restlessness of human desire, and Camus admired his psychological honesty while refusing his religious solution. Greek thought gave Camus something equally lasting: a sense of measure, or limit, that runs through all his later books. The Greek tragedians showed him that human beings suffer when they overreach, and that dignity lies in accepting a boundary rather than pretending it does not exist. This inheritance separates Camus from many of his contemporaries. Where German philosophy after Hegel tended to see history as moving toward a goal, Camus preferred the older idea of a fixed human nature facing a silent universe. His hostility to grand historical projects, which later caused public quarrels, has roots in these student years.

A second influence came from the modern writers who taught him how to describe a life without meaning. Camus read Friedrich Nietzsche closely and absorbed his announcement that God was dead, along with his demand that thinkers say yes to existence rather than seek comfort elsewhere. From Søren Kierkegaard and Lev Shestov he took the vocabulary of the absurd, though he accused them of escaping the problem by leaping into faith. Fyodor Dostoevsky mattered even more. The rebellious characters of The Brothers Karamazov and Demons gave Camus his lifelong subject: what a person may do once he decides that nothing is forbidden. He adapted Dostoevsky for the stage and returned to him in his study of rebellion. Franz Kafka supplied the model of a hero trapped in a system he cannot understand, and the American novelists James M. Cain and Ernest Hemingway shaped the flat, clipped prose of The Stranger. That famous opening, announcing a mother's death in a few dry words, owes as much to hard-boiled fiction as to any philosopher.

History supplied the third and most disturbing influence. Camus worked as a journalist in Algiers, where he reported on famine among the Kabyle population and criticized colonial injustice long before it became fashionable to do so. When Germany occupied France he joined the Resistance and edited the underground newspaper Combat. The experience changed his questions. Before the war he had asked whether life was worth living in a meaningless universe; afterward he asked how people could justify killing one another in the name of ideas. The revelation of the Nazi camps, followed by news of Soviet labor camps, convinced him that the century's greatest danger was the belief that a future paradise excused present murder. The Plague, published in 1947, turned the occupation into a story about ordinary people resisting a disaster without hope of reward. The Rebel, four years later, attacked revolutionary violence directly and triggered a bitter public break with Jean-Paul Sartre, whose defense of Marxist history Camus considered a betrayal of concrete human beings.

Camus was also shaped by pressures that had no easy resolution. The Algerian War of Independence, which began in 1954, placed him between the French community he came from and the Arab and Berber population whose grievances he had documented as a young reporter. He called for a civilian truce and refused to endorse either terrorism or repression, a position that satisfied almost nobody and left him increasingly isolated. Readers today still argue about whether his stance reflected principle or a failure to imagine full independence. What the episode reveals is how consistently his early influences held. The Greek idea of limit, the Augustinian awareness of guilt, the reporter's attention to actual victims, all pointed him away from total solutions. His unfinished novel The First Man, found in the wreck of the car in which he died in 1960, returned to his mother, his teacher, and the Algerian light of his childhood, as if to name the sources of everything else.

Tracing these influences does more than fill in biographical detail. It shows that a philosophy readers often treat as a mood was actually built from specific materials: an illiterate mother's silence, a Greek sense of proportion, Dostoevsky's dangerous questions, and the moral wreckage of war. Camus borrowed freely, argued with nearly everyone he read, and kept only what survived contact with lived experience. That method explains why his work still speaks to students who face problems he never imagined. He offers no system to memorize, only the example of a writer who refused both false hope and easy despair, and who insisted that thought must answer to the body, the landscape, and the neighbor standing nearby.

Did you like this example?

290

12