Is Islamophobia Racism? Racialization in Modern Societies

The word "Muslim" appears on the intake form under "religion," but the security officer decides who receives extra screening based on skin tone and last names. At the airport in Houston last December, I stood behind a woman in a cream hijab as the agent waved her to secondary inspection while two white travelers passed through without question. The agent never asked about her beliefs or practices. He saw brown skin and a headscarf and made his judgment. This moment captures why Islamophobia functions as racism even though Islam is not a race.

When religious identity becomes tied to physical appearance, national origin, and ethnic stereotypes, discrimination against Muslims operates through racial logic. The debate over whether Islamophobia qualifies as racism matters because it determines which legal protections apply and how seriously institutions take anti-Muslim hatred. Understanding Islamophobia as a form of racism reveals how modern societies construct racial categories not just around biology but around culture, religion, and perceived foreignness.

I first encountered this question in my Introduction to Sociology course during my sophomore year. Professor Ramirez asked us to consider how race is socially constructed rather than biologically fixed. I had always thought of racism as exclusively about skin color or ancestry. The idea that religion could become racialized seemed contradictory. Muslims come from every racial background, from Bosnian converts to Indonesian families to Black American communities. How could discrimination against such a diverse group be considered racism? That week I read about racialization, the process by which societies attach racial meanings to groups that were not previously understood in racial terms. Historically, Irish and Italian immigrants to America were racialized as non-white despite their European ancestry. Jews in Europe faced racialization for centuries, targeted not primarily for their religious practices but as an imagined racial threat. The reading helped me see that racism adapts to different contexts.

Islamophobia becomes racism when it relies on racial stereotypes and visual profiling rather than actual religious belief or practice. After the September 11 attacks, hate crimes targeted not only Muslims but also Sikhs, Hindus, and Arab Christians who "looked Muslim" to their attackers. A Sikh man wearing a turban gets called a terrorist. A Coptic Christian from Egypt faces discrimination at work. An atheist with a Pakistani name gets pulled aside at airport security. None of these people practice Islam, yet they experience Islamophobia because Americans have created a racial image of what a Muslim supposedly looks like: brown skin, Middle Eastern or South Asian features, specific clothing. This reveals that Islamophobia does not actually target religious belief. Instead, it targets a racialized identity that blends religion with ethnicity, nationality, and physical appearance. The discrimination operates through the same mechanisms as traditional racism: stereotyping entire groups as threatening, treating physical markers as signs of danger, and denying opportunities based on perceived group membership rather than individual character.

The language and imagery surrounding Islamophobia mirror classic racist discourse. Political rhetoric describes Muslims as a civilizational threat, culturally incompatible with Western values, prone to violence, and loyal to foreign powers rather than their home countries. These arguments echo nineteenth-century claims about the "yellow peril" and twentieth-century stereotypes about Black criminality. Media representations consistently show Muslim characters as terrorists, oppressed women, or backward foreigners, rarely as ordinary people. When a white shooter commits mass violence, news coverage emphasizes his individual psychology and personal struggles. When a Muslim commits violence, coverage immediately shifts to his religion and questions whether other Muslims share responsibility. This double standard exposes how Islamophobia constructs Muslims as a monolithic racial other. During my junior year, I wrote a paper analyzing news coverage of three similar crimes and found that only the Muslim perpetrator's religion appeared in headlines, while the white shooter's Christianity went unmentioned. The pattern shows how society racializes Muslim identity by treating it as more fundamental and more suspicious than other religious affiliations.

Legal and institutional responses to Islamophobia demonstrate its function as racism. Many countries lack specific laws against religious discrimination but do prohibit racial discrimination. If Islamophobia is merely religious prejudice, victims have fewer legal protections and less recourse. However, courts in several countries have recognized that anti-Muslim discrimination often violates anti-racism laws because it targets ethnic and national origin alongside religion. In the United States, the travel ban targeting Muslim-majority countries affected people based on nationality and perceived racial identity, not on any assessment of individual religious belief or practice. Employment discrimination cases show that Muslim women who wear hijab face rejection at higher rates than women with Muslim names who do not wear visible religious markers, suggesting that the visual racialized signal matters more than the actual religious identity. Public policy debates about Muslim immigration, mosque construction, and security surveillance consistently invoke racial language about cultural incompatibility and demographic threat. These institutional patterns reveal that modern societies treat Muslims as a racial group subject to collective suspicion and restriction.

Some argue that Islamophobia cannot be racism because Islam is a chosen belief system, not an inherited characteristic, and because legitimate criticism of religious ideas differs from prejudice against people. This perspective deserves consideration. Religious beliefs do shape behavior and values in ways that race does not, and democratic societies must be able to debate and criticize ideas, including religious doctrines. A person who converts to Islam makes a choice that a person born Black or Asian does not make. However, this argument misses how racialization works in practice. Most Muslims are born into Muslim families and communities, making Islam as much an inherited cultural identity as a chosen belief. More importantly, Islamophobic discrimination does not carefully distinguish between criticizing ideas and stereotyping people. The employer who refuses to hire someone with a Muslim name is not engaging in theological debate. The politician who calls for banning Muslim immigration is not critiquing specific doctrines. They are treating Muslims as a dangerous racial category. Even criticism that focuses on ideas often generalizes about 1.8 billion diverse people as if they all think and act identically, which is itself a form of racial thinking.

Understanding Islamophobia as racism changes how I see everyday interactions and how I think institutions should respond. When my classmate made a joke about someone's "terrorist beard" last semester, I recognized it as racist humor, not just religious insensitivity. When news coverage focuses obsessively on a Muslim politician's headscarf, I see the racialization at work. Treating Islamophobia as racism means taking it as seriously as other forms of racial discrimination, including it in diversity training, addressing it in hate crime legislation, and recognizing how it intersects with discrimination based on national origin and ethnicity. This framework also helps Muslims and their allies articulate what they experience, moving beyond defenses of Islam as a religion to confront the broader system of racialized thinking. The question is not whether Muslims constitute a biological race but whether anti-Muslim discrimination operates through racial logic, and the evidence overwhelmingly shows that it does. Recognizing this reality is the first step toward building institutions that judge people as individuals rather than as representatives of imagined threatening groups.

Did you like this example?

289

12