An Analysis of “Richard Cory” by Simon and Garfunkel

The first three piano chords of "Richard Cory" drop like stones into still water, slow and minor, setting a mood the lyrics will never escape. Simon and Garfunkel released this adaptation of Edwin Arlington Robinson's 1897 poem in 1966, transforming a neat sixteen lines into a folk ballad that stretched the original's quiet despair into something louder and more contemporary. The song keeps Robinson's central irony—a man everyone admires takes his own life—but shifts the perspective from detached observer to working-class narrator who explicitly contrasts his poverty with Cory's wealth.

This critical analysis argues that while Simon and Garfunkel preserve the poem's shock ending, they fundamentally alter its meaning by making economic inequality the explicit cause of the narrator's suffering and by turning Cory into a more distant, almost mythical figure rather than a fellow townsman.

Robinson's poem emerged during the Gilded Age, when American industrial wealth created visible gaps between social classes. His Richard Cory is described through the eyes of "we people on the pavement," who admire his grace, his quiet manner, and his wealth but remain separate from him. The poem uses formal diction and a regular rhyme scheme to create distance between reader and subject. Simon and Garfunkel's version arrived during a different moment of American anxiety about inequality, as the 1960s saw growing awareness of poverty despite national prosperity. Paul Simon added verses that Robinson never wrote, expanding a brief character sketch into a narrative with explicit class resentment. The song uses folk music's traditional role as a vehicle for social criticism, placing it in conversation with other contemporary songs about economic hardship.

The most significant change Simon and Garfunkel make is adding specificity to the narrator's suffering. Robinson's speaker mentions only that "we" worked and "waited for the light," a vague phrase that could mean hope or simply the end of a workday. Simon's lyrics are blunt: "I work in his factory." The narrator describes wishing he could be Cory, having what Cory has, living how Cory lives. He curses his own birth and explicitly envies Cory's privileges. This addition transforms the poem from an observation about appearance versus reality into a statement about class division. The narrator's misery has a clear source—his economic position—whereas Robinson's speaker seems more puzzled than angry. The song makes the inequality not just visible but oppressive, with the narrator trapped in a system where one man owns the factory and others labor inside it.

The musical arrangement reinforces this tone of entrapment and sorrow. The minor key and the descending bass line create a feeling of weight, of something pulling downward. The tempo is slow, almost dirge-like, which makes the final line about Cory's death land differently than it does in the poem. Robinson's ending is shocking because of its suddenness; the poem moves at a steady pace and then stops with violence. The song's ending feels almost inevitable, as if the whole musical structure has been building toward collapse. The repetition of the melody across multiple verses also creates monotony, which mirrors the narrator's repetitive labor and unchanging circumstances. Where Robinson uses literary craft to create surprise, Simon and Garfunkel use musical craft to create a sense of doom.

Yet the adaptation loses something crucial in making its point so clear. Robinson's poem leaves ambiguity about why Cory kills himself. Readers assume his wealth did not bring happiness, but the poem never explains what he lacked. This mystery is part of the poem's power; it resists easy interpretation. Simon and Garfunkel's version risks suggesting that the real tragedy is the narrator's poverty rather than Cory's death. The final verse pivots to Cory's suicide, but it arrives after several verses of the narrator's complaints, which can make Cory seem less like a suffering human and more like a symbol the narrator projected his hopes onto. The song's social criticism is sharper, but its human insight is narrower. Robinson allows readers to see both Cory's isolation and the townspeople's illusions; the song focuses mainly on the narrator's bitterness.

Despite these differences, both works succeed in exposing the gap between public image and private reality. Robinson does this through irony and compression, ending a portrait of apparent perfection with sudden violence. Simon and Garfunkel do this through emotional intensity and repetition, building the narrator's longing across multiple verses before revealing it was aimed at someone equally miserable. The song makes explicit what the poem implies: that envy is based on incomplete information, that wealth and admiration do not equal contentment. Cory remains unknowable in both versions, a figure observed from outside, but the song's narrator is far more present and vocal than Robinson's collective "we." This shift reflects folk music's tradition of giving voice to ordinary people, even as it changes the balance of the story. Both poem and song ultimately suggest that suffering crosses class lines, even when its forms differ, and that the facades people maintain can hide desperation no observer would guess at.

Did you like this example?

328

14